this is why I started this thread, the purple logo fever is getting out of hand.
Īgreed, it looks cheap and IS cheap as it`s just paint under the laquer instead of a stamp in the brass or engraving. It`d be good to de-mythify the purple logo once and for all as either truth or bunkum, Pro horns only or the 32s and students as well. I know the subject has come up loads of times but usually along with the grips of Purple fever or Purple Hatred from the posters involved. ġ:- If any of the better action business is true does it onlu relate to the 61 and 62 modelsĢ:- there are 21, 23 and 32 Purple logos horns too, does "Purpleness" apply to those ? if so Howģ:- if you got SH to setup a 62 Purp and a 62 Mk1 would they handle the same, sound the same ?Ĥ:- is all this down to Specific horns ? (comparing a cherrypicked MK3 to a Purple with same neck, would the Mk3 win)Įtc etc. Steve Howard mentions the purple logo as a means of cheaper labelling. there`s talk about them being setup alongside Pro players instead of in the workshop (but a trip to SH would equalize that) and even about having better quality action. I was thinking it was time to de-mythify the Yamaha Purple Logo in one thread.
0 kommentar(er)
